[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem |
Date: |
Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:25:54 +0100 (MET) |
As "David Brown" <address@hidden> wrote:
>However, there are two rules regarding dynamic memory in small
>embedded systems - 1) Don't use dynamic memory in small embedded
>systems, and 2) if you really do have to use dynamic memory in small
>embedded systems, don't use malloc() and free(), but write your own
>system.
While I fully agree with 1), what's your reasoning for 2)? I do
understand that there might be reasons for it, but I don't think
giving this as a general advise sounds right to me.
--
J"org Wunsch Unix support engineer
address@hidden http://www.interface-systems.de/~j/
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Richard Urwin, 2004/02/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, David Brown, 2004/02/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Eric Fu, 2004/02/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, David Brown, 2004/02/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Joerg Wunsch, 2004/02/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, David Brown, 2004/02/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Erik Christiansen, 2004/02/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Simon Han, 2004/02/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Erik Christiansen, 2004/02/04
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Struct problem, Simon Han, 2004/02/04