Re: Antworten: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Problem with the calling convention

[E. Weddington]

On 15 Jul 2004 at 20:29, Dmitry K. wrote:

> > As E. Weddington wrote:
> > > Do we know if this is a regression? If we can discover that this is
> > > a regression then we're more likely to get a fix in say 3.4.2
> > > instead of having to wait until 3.5.
> >
> > Right you are!
> >
> > I tried it on a GCC 3.3.1 I've still got around on one of my machines,
> > and it properly moves arg `d' away into r14..r17, and uses these
> > registers in the following statements.
> >
> > So yes, it is a regression.
> 
> 3.3.2 and 3.3.4 produce true code (`d' saved in r14..r17 before calls).

So what does this boil down to? That the problem is somewhere between 3.3.4 and 
3.4.0?

Eric