Re: [avr-gcc-list] Now to do Tail Recursions?

[Bob Paddock]

On Monday 30 August 2004 08:14 pm, Douglas Dotson wrote:
> This only works when the only thing on the stack is
> the return address. High level languages like C
> establish a stack frame that includes local varbs,
> parameters, registers, etc.

Doesn't the AVR have a separate call/return stack from
the parameter stack?

I raised the question based on actual code I saw
coming from the compiler.  There where no stack issues
other involved.

-- 
                          http://www.softwaresafety.net/
 http://www.unusualresearch.com/ http://www.bpaddock.com/