[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr
From: |
Dmitry K. |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Dec 2004 13:52:13 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
At 2 Dec 2004 12:36 Erik wrote:
...
> Is there a description or example somewhere, of what is needed?
> Alternatively, could you send directly the attachments that the list
> server stripped from your post? From there, we can hopefully clarify
> what I could help with.
>
In the majority test sets include both an initial file, and manually prepared
sample for the subsequent check. I would like that manual work was limited
only to a spelling of an initial file with special comments.
Erik, inform me if the attachment will be again cut off. Perhaps, it is a
problem somewhere at me.
Thanks.
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Erik Christiansen, 2004/12/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr,
Dmitry K. <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, E. Weddington, 2004/12/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Erik Christiansen, 2004/12/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Klaus Rudolph, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, E. Weddington, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Klaus Rudolph, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, E. Weddington, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Theodore A. Roth, 2004/12/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Klaus Rudolph, 2004/12/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] binutils/.../testsuite/avr, Erik Christiansen, 2004/12/05