Re: [avr-gcc-list] gcc prolog incorrect?

[E. Weddington]

Jeff Barlow wrote:

> "Dave Hansen" <address@hidden>  wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Worse than broken.  On the AVR,  it is _impossible_ to return from an 
> > interrupt (more specifically RETI) without enabling interrupts.
> >    
>
> Well, you could just do a ret, but that would be pretty silly.
>
>  

That implies:
- Writing the ISR in assembly, which in the case of writing RET instead 
of RETI, this would be a pilot error.
- A broken compiler.