Re: [avr-gcc-list] WinAVR inline assembler

[Joerg Wunsch]

"Jens Andersen" <address@hidden> wrote:

> asm("ldi r16, 0x80");
> asm("sts 0x61, r16"); // CLKPR

> This is mutch closer to the Atmel syntax than
> the gnu assembler syntax.

Huh?  In what respect is it?  Both assemblers basically differ in
their pseudo-op syntax, and obviously, inline asm doesn't need
pseudo-ops.

> However if i try to use symbolic names from
> the header target specific header file (mega48)
> i get a undefined symbol error.

Please RTFAQ.  It's FAQ entry #9.

-- 
cheers, J"org               .-.-.   --... ...--   -.. .  DL8DTL

http://www.sax.de/~joerg/                        NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)