Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?

[Alexei Chetroi]

On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 01:35:09PM +1000, Dmitry K. wrote:
> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 13:35:09 +1000
> From: "Dmitry K." <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: [avr-libc-dev] RE: [avr-gcc-list] Poll: Who uses itoa() & co with
>       base != {2, 8, 10, 16}?
> 
> > > I vote for something like itoa_fast() and have itoa() keeps its old
> > > features.
> > >
> > >   Bernard
> >
> > If anyone is counting votes then mine is to support Bernard, keep itoa as
> > is but introduce a restricted replacement with a new name.
> >
> 
> I join this opinion.
> 
> Dmitry.

  So do I.

-- 
  Best wishes

--
Alexei Chetroi

Smile... Tomorrow will be worse. (c) Murphy's Law