RE: [avr-gcc-list] More observations: array of pointers to functions

[David McNab]

On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 13:22 -0700, Eric Weddington wrote:
> The line that you have above does some pretty needles math. You should be
> able to just simply do:
> 
>     fptr = (FuncPtr)pgm_read_word(&funcs_table[i]);
> 
> Does that make any difference in the size of your code? It would be
> interesting to know one way or the other...

The above option generates a whole lot more code.

I posted my code earlier because I found that while it's not the most
elegant C, it does generate the smallest code with gcc-avr at -O3

Cheers
David