[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Strange delay behavior
From: |
Eric Weddington |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Strange delay behavior |
Date: |
Fri, 06 Jul 2007 17:43:27 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Per-Tore Aasestrand [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 5:40 PM
> To: Eric Weddington; address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] Strange delay behavior
>
> Hello,
>
> At 23:20 06.07.2007, Eric Weddington wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:
> > address@hidden
> > [
> mailto:address@hidden
> <mailto:address@hidden> .
> > org] On Behalf Of Per-Tore Aasestrand
> > Sent: Saturday, June 09, 2007 12:06 PM
> > To: address@hidden
> > Subject: [avr-gcc-list] Strange delay behavior
> >
> > Hello list,
> >
> > I've suddenly run into something odd. I am using AVR Studio
> > Version 4.12 Service Pack 4 with WinAVR 20060421. Have been
> > using this setup for a while without any problems.
> >
> > Now, running the following test program on a ATmega128 @ 8
> > MHz, produces pulses on PC3. However, with 'off' period of
> > 1,45 ms and 'on' period of 2,45 ms and. I had of course
> > expected 1ms and 2 ms, respectively.
> >
> > I ran the same program using CodeVision, and then the
> periods were OK.
> >
> > Guess I've overlooked something.
> > Any idea, someone?
>
> What's your optimization setting (-O) ?
>
>
> Yes, it was -O!! ;-)
>
> Are there some guidelines for proper use of optimization settings?
>
> This message was sent to the list about one month ago. I was
> quickly tipped off to check the optimization setting. For
> some odd reason, it popped up again today. Wonder what happened.
I don't know. I just figured out that I was replying to old messages. Silly
me.
Anyway, use some form of optimization (such as -O1, -O2, -O3, -Os). :-)
Eric