avr-gcc-list
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest


From: Weddington, Eric
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2008 11:34:36 -0700

 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: 
> address@hidden 
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Paulo Marques
> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2008 11:27 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-gcc-list] More results from the testsuite with avrtest
> 
> 
> Hi, all
> 
> I've been running the testsuite from SVN with avrtest to 
> track down the 
> latest bugs. I've finally track down every failure in 
> execute.exp, and 
> I'm preparing to move on to the full testsuite (I hope).
> 
> So, here's a list of all the problems so far:
> 
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution,  -O0
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution,  -O1
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution,  -O2
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution,  -O3 -g
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution,  -Os
> 
> There is something fishy going on with __builtin_return_address. This 
> test in particular only fails when it is compiled with 
> "-Wl,-u,vfprintf 
> -lprintf_flt". This probably is just an indirect effect of some code 
> reordering due to the increased image size, or something. Still needs 
> more investigation.


This one is already recorded as GCC bug #21078, Bjoern Haase (CCed):
<http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21078>

 
Eric Weddington 




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]