Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for pm() annotation

[Andrew Hutchinson]

Eric,

I could check to see if direct constant is "odd" in C. It  is not too 
difficult.

However, its not trivial either and wont find "odd" symbols.  So I'm 
leaving that alone.

After all, if you are doing non-standard function pointer arithmetic, 
you should be aware of what might go wrong.

Can you mark:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27192

as duplicate of 35013  and point to the  same potential solution?

Both need testing, there might be hidden bug where we don't want pm() 
around an expression.

I'm running testsuite - but it's slow!

Andy




Weddington, Eric wrote:
>  
>
>   
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andrew Hutchinson [mailto:address@hidden 
> > Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 2:47 PM
> > To: Weddington, Eric
> > Cc: Wouter van Gulik; address@hidden
> > Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug35013 - Incomplete check for 
> > pm() annotation
> >
> > Thanks Eric , that was it.
> >
> > Unfortunately it is only linker WARNING and easily missed during 
> > compilation.
> >
> >
> >     
>
> Hey, look! Something else to fix... ;-)
>
> Eric
>
>