Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument

[hutchinsonandy]

Looks like the thin air has affected  Eric's sense of humor.

:-)



-----Original Message-----
From: Weddington, Eric <address@hidden>
To: Andy H <address@hidden>; Ron Kreymborg 
<address@hidden>; AVR-GCC <address@hidden>
Sent: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 10:10 pm
Subject: RE: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument





> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Andy H
> Sent: Monday, March 31, 2008 8:26 PM
> To: Ron Kreymborg; AVR-GCC
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] RFC: Patch for "signal" argument
>
> It's possible to have a target specific compilation flag that turns
> error into warning. Perhaps
>
> -no-error-but-warn-me-until-i-figure-it-out.
>
> ..or similar.

That seems rather silly. Make it a warning, and then if the user wants
to turn it into an error then they just use -Werror.