[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, cre
|
From: |
Colin D Bennett |
|
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable |
|
Date: |
Fri, 18 Apr 2008 13:36:37 -0700 |
On Fri, 18 Apr 2008 10:23:04 -0700
Colin D Bennett <address@hidden> wrote:
> ...so gcc silently
> assumed that putting the variable at 0x60 is OK. By adding
> -mmcu=atmega88 to the linker flags, the variable was then placed at
> RAM address 0x100, which then made the code behave properly on the
> target device.
One more piece of information: I tested gcc 4.2.3 as well as gcc trunk
(4.4 dev) and observed the same behavior in both.
Regards,
Colin
- [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Colin D Bennett, 2008/04/18
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable,
Colin D Bennett <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, David Brown, 2008/04/19
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/04/19
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/21
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/04/21
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/21
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Dave N6NZ, 2008/04/21
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Bug? gcc silently assumes mcu model when linking, creating bad executable, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/21