Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: "progmem_far" attribute

[Andy H]

I was describing concept - not literally.

Literal it would be

|*int* (far *x)(*float*, *char*, *char*) = NULL;  |

or similar.

Internally we would handle as unsigned long (SImode).
If we get that far without a road block, then the last step is for gcc 
to permit a call using this and not squark that it is not a pointer.

Andy


Bob Paddock wrote:
> On 7/20/08, Andy H <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>   
> >  If we can create "FAR" as unsigned long
> >     
>
> Should that not be size_t rather than unsigned long?
>
> Might not make a difference on the smaller AVR's right
> now but if we ever need to port the code to a future AVR64
> it might.
>
>