[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Nov 2008 22:01:09 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
As Sparr wrote:
> Fixed registers just make this problem much easier to spot.
Sure, but there's "bigger fish to fry", i. e. there are so many more
not-quite-optimal parts in the code generation that I'd see this one
as being really a low-priority item.
Of course, if you've got a fix for it, go ahead, and file a bug report
together with the suggested fix. However, if you don't have a patch,
I'm afraid the available "human resources" won't make it very likely
that anyone would deal with the issue within a reasonable timeframe.
--
cheers, J"org .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?, Sparr, 2008/11/11
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?, Weddington, Eric, 2008/11/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?, Gre7g Luterman, 2008/11/11
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?, Joerg Wunsch, 2008/11/12
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] foo++, subi vs inc?, Marek Michalkiewicz, 2008/11/12