[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Mar 2009 13:39:18 -0700 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Paddock [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 9:59 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance
>
> Would be nice. There are probably legal issues with doing that.
> MISRA is one of those things you must buy. There are not Open Source
> versions, as MISRA does not allow the distribution of the
> rules without
> proper licensing.
I wasn't aware of that. How disgusting.
> MISRA aside I think everyone should invest in their own copy of Lint,
> especially people new to the language. One of the few tools
> priced within
> the range of an individual. There is the Open Source Splint:
> http://www.splint.org/ , however I'm not very familiar with it.
I've looked briefly into building splint and redistributing it with WinAVR.
IIRC, I had problems with building it. But I still think it's a good idea.
> After a while you get to the point of writing your code where
> you end up with
> a dialog going on in your head: "Lint is going to complain
> about that, do
> it this way instead". For example while(1){} per Lint and MISRA 13.7,
> should be for(;;){} to prevent "constant value Boolean" error.
That is totally stupid.
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, David Brown, 2009/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, Vincent Trouilliez, 2009/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/03/01
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, David Brown, 2009/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/03/01
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, David Brown, 2009/03/01
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/03/01
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: C vs. assembly performance, David Brown, 2009/03/02