[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf
From: |
Stu Bell |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:46:45 -0700 |
> > (The compiler would even be allowed to optimize the sprintf() case,
> > but by now, it doesn't do that.)
>
> Is it possible for a compiler to be *too* good, if it
> generates optimal code despite terrible source?
Not according to many of the whiner... Errr.... *users* that post
regularly on this mail list, AVR Freaks, etc.
I've been waiting for almost 40 years for a compiler/interpreter that
would do what I *meant* instead of what I *programmed*! :D
Best regards,
Stu Bell
DataPlay (DPHI, Inc.)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David VanHorn, 2009/03/02
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/03
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Brown, 2009/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Pertti Kellomäki, 2009/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Georg-Johann Lay, 2009/03/03
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/05
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Brown, 2009/03/05
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/06
- [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, David Brown, 2009/03/06
- RE: [avr-gcc-list] Re: sprintf, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/06