[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches |
Date: |
Wed, 17 Oct 2012 18:26:59 +0000 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden On
> Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 12:02 PM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches
>
> "Weddington, Eric" <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > Gah, that last sentence should read: So, *those* files would have to
> > be submitted to avr-libc *by Atmel*.
>
> If they've already got a BSD-style copyright when they are shipping as
> part of the Atmel toolchain (I didn't look whether they do), this
> copyright statement itself would be enough to be integrated into the
> public avr-libc repository, because the redistribution clauses in a
> BSD-style copyright already do allow it.
Point. But we need to check the license.
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, (continued)
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Praveen, Vidya, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, David Brown, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/16
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Weddington, Eric, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches,
Weddington, Eric <=
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Joerg Wunsch, 2012/10/17
- Re: [avr-gcc-list] Porting Atmel patches, Georg-Johann Lay, 2012/10/17