Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Licensing information

[Theodore A. Roth]

On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, E. Weddington wrote:

> Joerg Wunsch wrote:
>
> >As E. Weddington wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >>Now to the big problem: The original license file said that avr-libc was
> >>a Modified BSD License (with the No Advertising clause). However the
> >>"template" that it gave for new authors, only showed the original two
> >>clauses of the BSD license.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >For those files where I hold the copyright, I don't mind whether it's
> >the 2-clause or 3-clause version.  I agree we should settle for one of
> >both, and see to convert the remaining files (given author's
> >permission).
> >
>
> So, Ted. What's your opinion. 2-clause? or 3-clause?

3-clause:

   1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
   2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
      notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the
      documentation and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
   3. The name of the author may not be used to endorse or promote products
      derived from this software without specific prior written permission.


---
Ted Roth
PGP Key ID: 0x18F846E9
Jabber ID: address@hidden