RE: [avr-libc-dev] Postscript documentation still needed?

[Eric Weddington]

> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> org] On Behalf Of Joerg Wunsch
> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2007 7:58 AM
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avr-libc-dev] Postscript documentation still needed?
>
> We've been shipping documentation as HTML, Postscript, and PDF for
> quite some years now.  As compiling the intermediate LaTeX code into
> PS and PDF requires different settings, this causes two runs of
> doxygen to build the documentation.
>
> I wonder whether people do actually value the PS version at all, or if
> we could simply drop it from the build as anyone who wants a printed
> manual could always print the PDF version instead (which gives a
> similarly high-quality print as PS does).
>
> Opinions?

I'm all for dropping the PS version of the docs. HTML and PDF are sufficient
for me.

... But you could've probably guessed that. ;-)

Eric