[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATm
From: |
Weddington, Eric |
Subject: |
RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x |
Date: |
Wed, 9 Apr 2008 13:45:41 -0600 |
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stu Bell [mailto:address@hidden
> Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:39 PM
> To: Weddington, Eric; Dmitry K.; address@hidden
> Subject: RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878]
> eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x
>
> I'm not sure I should respond to this, as I'm not sure what the asm
> directive ".rept 30000" does. If I'm way off base, just email me
> directly and I'll shut up.
>
> The compiled code does show that, for an avr6, the function
> pointer code
> is wrong (okay, not completely right).
>
Well I was responding to Dmitry's claims which he put in a comment at
the top of the source code:
/* avr-gcc 4.4-20080404 + binutils 2.18 produce incorrect code: the
foo4()
function stores 0 value to 'vp' variable.
Options: -W -Wall -Os -mmcu=atmega2560
*/
The code generated by 4.3.0 + Andy's combine patch shows that the foo4()
function does NOT store 0 value to 'vp' variable. At least that's my
interpretation. As to the validity of what it is storing, I don't know
about that.
Eric
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hang in ATmega256x, Stu Bell, 2008/04/08
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hang in ATmega256x, Eric Weddington, 2008/04/08
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hang in ATmega256x, Dmitry K., 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hangin ATmega256x, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehangin ATmega256x, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x, Stu Bell, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x, Stu Bell, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x,
Weddington, Eric <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/blockcausehanginATmega256x, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/blockcausehanginATmega256x, Dmitry K., 2008/04/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/blockcausehanginATmega256x, Dmitry K., 2008/04/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehanginATmega256x, Erik Christiansen, 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/blockcausehanginATmega256x, Stu Bell, 2008/04/10
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hangin ATmega256x, Stu Bell, 2008/04/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block cause hangin ATmega256x, Dmitry K., 2008/04/09
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehangin ATmega256x, Weddington, Eric, 2008/04/09
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [bug #22878] eeprom_*_word/dword/block causehangin ATmega256x, Dmitry K., 2008/04/09