[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API
From: |
Dmitry K. |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API |
Date: |
Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:22:43 +1000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.5 |
On Friday 06 February 2009 09:10, Weddington, Eric wrote:
[...]
> +#define sleep_bod_disable() \
> +(__extension__({ \
> + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
> + "ori %0,%1" \
> + : "+d" (MCUCR) \
> + : "i" (_BV(BODS) | _BV(BODSE)) \
> + ); \
> + __asm__ __volatile__ ( \
> + "andi %0,%1" \
> + : "=d" (MCUCR) \
> + : "i" (~_BV(BODSE)) \
> + ); \
> +}))
Hmm...
It is interesting to omit IN/OUT instruction in such manner.
I will check this for all Avr-gcc versions.
Thanks, this is new for me.
Dmitry.
- [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/05
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/05
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API,
Dmitry K. <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06
- Message not available
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/06
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/06
- Message not available
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/06
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/02/06
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Sleeping BOD API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/02/06