[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API
From: |
Bob Paddock |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:45:38 -0500 |
>> Delays fixing the Tiny88?
>
> Please reference a bug report. I don't know what you mean here.
bug #14855: Link Error "relocation truncated to fit: R_AVR_13_PCREL"
https://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?14855
"Yeah, it took me a while to figure this one out, but I finally did
recently. FYI, you also ran into a bug that has now been fixed, but
not yet released.
The R_AVR_13_PCREL relocation is typically where a rjmp/rcall is not
working due to total code size. The "13_PCREL" part means a 13-bit
relative to PC. RJMP/RCALL can address +/- 2K words, hence 8K bytes
total range and 2^13 = 8K.
You're using tiny88 which is avr25 architecture. There was a bug
recently in binutils, where it wasn't probably doing the wraparound
for this relocation because the avr25 arch was forgotten to be added
to a list. This is fixed now and will be in the next WinAVR release.
I'm trying to get a WinAVR RC out this week. We should see if that
helps your situation."
- [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Sergey A. Borshch, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/04
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/04
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/04
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Joerg Wunsch, 2009/03/04
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] [RFC] Signature API, Weddington, Eric, 2009/03/19