[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #26188] Wrong or missing definition of SIGNATURE_X i
From: |
Andreas Vogt |
Subject: |
[avr-libc-dev] [bug #26188] Wrong or missing definition of SIGNATURE_X in iom644.h and others |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:10:08 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.9.0.8) Gecko/2009032609 Firefox/3.0.8 (.NET CLR 3.5.30729) |
URL:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?26188>
Summary: Wrong or missing definition of SIGNATURE_X in
iom644.h and others
Project: AVR C Runtime Library
Submitted by: tico_avr
Submitted on: Mi 15 Apr 2009 16:10:02 GMT
Category: Header
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
Item Group: Header files
Status: None
Percent Complete: 0%
Assigned to: None
Open/Closed: Open
Discussion Lock: Any
Release: 1.6.4
Fixed Release: None
_______________________________________________________
Details:
The file iom644.h contains the line:
#define SIGNATURE_2 0x09
This definition is true only for the ATmega644, but NOT for the ATmega644P.
The file io.h includes iom644.h for both MCUs, so, if you compile for
ATmega644P, the definition is wrong and should be 0x0a.
The files iom164.h and iom324.h do not contain any signature definitions.
The signatures for the ATmega164P (iom164.h) are (taken from ATMEL doku):
#define SIGNATURE_0 0x1e
#define SIGNATURE_1 0x94
#define SIGNATURE_2 0x0a
The signatures for the ATmega324P (iom324.h) are (taken from ATMEL doku):
#define SIGNATURE_0 0x1e
#define SIGNATURE_1 0x95
#define SIGNATURE_2 0x08
_______________________________________________________
Reply to this item at:
<http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?26188>
_______________________________________________
Nachricht geschickt von/durch Savannah
http://savannah.nongnu.org/
- [avr-libc-dev] [bug #26188] Wrong or missing definition of SIGNATURE_X in iom644.h and others,
Andreas Vogt <=