[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?
From: |
dpc |
Subject: |
Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 07:53:32 +0900 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (darwin) |
"Weddington, Eric" <address@hidden> writes:
>> -----Original Message----- From:
>> address@hidden
>> avr-libc-1.6.8?
>>
>> apologies if this is the wrong list or something i missed in the
>> archives.
>>
>> short story: i get an ICE w/ gcc 4.6 when building avr-libc-1.4.8.
>
> There is no GCC 4.6 release. The latest is GCC 4.5.0, unless you are
> doing development work on GCC HEAD (which will be the future 4.6). And
> avr-libc 1.4.8 is a very old version. At the least, you should be
> using 1.6.8 as that is known stable.
sorry, that's a typo for the avr-libc version. should be 1.6.8.
i had pulled gcc 4.6 to test something else that we noticed was broken
in our local tree and figured i could just save myself the download-time.
\p
---
Mistakes are the portals of discovery. - James Joyce
- [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/17
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?,
dpc <=
- RE: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Weddington, Eric, 2010/06/17
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, Joerg Wunsch, 2010/06/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/22
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/23
- Re: [avr-libc-dev] gcc4.6 vs avr-libc-1.6.8?, dpc, 2010/06/18