[avr-libc-dev] [bug #50270] Article "Problems with reordering code" misleading

[Marcin Godlewski]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #50270 (project avr-libc):

1. I don't think I confuse volatile memory access with volatile asm
statements.What is your point here?

2. I've already discussed the problem in the list address@hidden and
I got feedback to submit a bug report. Please search for a topic
Avr-libc-user-manual: "Problems with reordering code".

3. I don't say the article is written without a reason. But it simply seems to
give inaccurate conclusions.

4. I also don't understand your last point. What blunt statement did I give? I
simply explained why I think the conclusions in article are wrong. I
understand that something may "look much more reasonable" to you, but such
comments doesn't bring any value in the discussion. I hope to have a
content-related discussion.


    _______________________________________________________

Reply to this item at:

  <http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?50270>

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.nongnu.org/