[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [avrdude-dev] [patch] new hash implementation
From: |
Alex Shepherd |
Subject: |
RE: [avrdude-dev] [patch] new hash implementation |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Jul 2003 09:15:17 +1200 |
Hi Guys,
I have applied the patch and it seems to work well in both the Win2k CMD
shell and in the JFE IDE.
I'm happy with how it works - thanks.
I posted the binary for others to test here:
http://www.wave.co.nz/~ashepherd/Avrdude_30_July.zip
Cheers
Alex
PS I had to manually resolve 1 chunk of the patch:
- while ((ch = getopt(argc,argv,"?c:C:eE:f:Fi:I:m:no:p:P:tvVyY:")) != -1) {
+ while ((ch = getopt(argc,argv,"?c:C:eE:f:Fi:I:m:no:p:P:qtvVyY:")) != -1)
{
You must have some different args to the src I started with.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: address@hidden
> [mailto:address@hidden
> Behalf Of
> Theodore A. Roth
> Sent: Saturday, 26 July 2003 12:34 p.m.
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: [avrdude-dev] [patch] new hash implementation
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I went ahead and implemented my hash idea I previously posted.
>
> Tested with (stk500):
>
> $ ./avrdude -p atmega128 -i cs8900a/test_cs8900a.srec -e -f
> s -m flash -v -v
>
> and:
>
> $ ./avrdude -p atmega128 -i cs8900a/test_cs8900a.srec -e -f
> s -m flash -v -v 2>&1 | cat
>
> To see both the tty and non-tty output. They both look like this when
> done:
>
> avrdude: AVR device initialized and ready to accept instructions
>
> Reading | ################################################### | 100%
> avrdude: Device signature = 0x1e9702
> avrdude: erasing chip
> avrdude: done.
> avrdude: reading input file "cs8900a/test_cs8900a.srec"
> avrdude: writing flash (13540 bytes):
>
> Writing | ################################################## | 100%
> avrdude: 13568 bytes of flash written
> avrdude: verifying flash memory against cs8900a/test_cs8900a.srec:
> avrdude: reading on-chip flash data:
>
> Reading | ################################################## | 100%
> avrdude: verifying ...
> avrdude: 13568 bytes of flash verified
>
> avrdude done. Thank you.
>
>
> Still needs tested with a parallel programmer though. I'm sure it's a
> bit rough, so I don't plan on committing it without an OK.
>
> Ted Roth