[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault
From: |
Joerg Wunsch |
Subject: |
Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault |
Date: |
Mon, 6 May 2013 20:19:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
As René Liebscher wrote:
> as C guarantees only 16 bit for an int but 32 bit for a long, you
> better take the long as fallback. (even if is unlikely that avrdude
> will ever be compiled for a machine with only 16 bit integer.)
We rely on default integers being 32 bit in AVRDUDE in so many places,
so I think this is a moot point.
If you really think it's necessary, you could still check for UINT_MAX
being large enough. I think that's better than potentially allocating
64-bit integers here.
--
cheers, Joerg .-.-. --... ...-- -.. . DL8DTL
http://www.sax.de/~joerg/
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, (continued)
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Enoch, 2013/05/04
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Joerg Wunsch, 2013/05/04
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Enoch, 2013/05/04
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Joerg Wunsch, 2013/05/05
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Joerg Wunsch, 2013/05/06
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Joerg Wunsch, 2013/05/06
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, René Liebscher, 2013/05/06
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault,
Joerg Wunsch <=
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Hannes Weisbach, 2013/05/07
- Re: [avrdude-dev] avrdude r1160 Segmentation fault, Joerg Wunsch, 2013/05/07