|
From: | Ralf Hemmecke |
Subject: | [Axiom-developer] Type: Type |
Date: | Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:42:04 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.5 (X11/20060719) |
At the logical level, as I have observed some time ago, there is an inconsistency problem with Type:Type. I'm wondering how Aldor gets away with that. Many languages (mostly functional) use stratified types.
That question should be asked at aldor-l.Can you construct a paradox that demonstrates the problem in terms of Aldor code? To me it looks like the class (not set) of all classes. Would there be a problem in class theory?
Ralf
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |