[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version
From: |
Franz Lehner |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Jun 2007 14:02:58 +0200 (CEST) |
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
I am just building safe version. Testsuite run took 235 minutes
compared to 18 minutues for safety 1 version. While testsuite
probably is different than normal workload, it clearly shows
that runtime speed is even more affected than build time.
So it was not just my feeling ...
So I guess one has to have two versions around, one for working and
another for testing. This way I can confirm that the building instructions
for aldor are indeed correct, except for a typo
(cd obj/x86_64-unknown-linux$; ln -s ../../src/interp/ .)
^
and the fact that I did not mention that `document' must be in the path.
Now a question for the gurus:
If I now have two versions of libaxiom.al, one built from wh-sandbox with
safety 1 and another one with safety 3, but otherwise identical, is it
necessary to compile my own packages for each version separately?
Franz
- RE: [Axiom-developer] merge branches/daly to trunk (was: NAG libraries), (continued)
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Alfredo Portes, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] NAG libraries, Franz Lehner, 2007/06/04
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version, Waldek Hebisch, 2007/06/07
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Safe version,
Franz Lehner <=