[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure)
From: |
Bill Page |
Subject: |
Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure) |
Date: |
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:18:36 -0400 |
On 8/12/07, William Sit wrote:
>
> Ah, of course (SandBox), stupid me!
> Thanks for "upgrading" the page.
>
Don't worry. Editing and correcting it first as a SandBox page and
then renaming it is often the best way.
> Now I wonder if I should remove my wrong conjecture on
> "has" has higher precedence. What do you think (as a
> general principle, should wrong explanations be removed)?
>
Well, it's up to you but I would suggest maybe leave it a while in
case your thoughts about this trigger comments from other readers.
Later after readers have had a chance to make their own comments you
can "clean it up" if you like so that it represents the correct or at
least consensus opinion.
In general I would only remove "wrong explanations" if they could be
misleading and are not identified as such.
Thanks for your work on this!
Regards,
Bill Page.
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, (continued)
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, William Sit, 2007/08/16
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, Martin Rubey, 2007/08/16
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/16
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, Martin Rubey, 2007/08/16
- [Axiom-developer] Re: .spad, .input, .as and autocoercion, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/16
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Bill Page, 2007/08/13
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), Ralf Hemmecke, 2007/08/14
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure), William Sit, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] "has" and "with" (was curious algebra failure),
Bill Page <=
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Martin Rubey, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/12
- Re: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/08/11
RE: [Axiom-developer] A curious algebra failure, Weiss, Juergen, 2007/08/12