[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?
From: |
Stephen Watt |
Subject: |
Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom? |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Sep 2007 23:39:10 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 11:22:31PM -0400, Bill Page wrote:
> ...
> Are you aware that currently Aldor works within Axiom by compiling to
> Lisp? How do you see FOAM being involved? Could you expand a little on
> this comment?
In case it is not clear: FOAM is the compilation target for Aldor, and this
is used to generate low-level Lisp.
FOAM is designed to have only operations that are efficient both in Lisp
and in a machine code-only environment. (So, for example, there is no way
to take an address of something.)
-- Stephen
- [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/09/03
- Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/03
- Re: [fricas-devel] Re: [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/09/03
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?,
Stephen Watt <=
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Laurentiu Dragan, 2007/09/04
- Re: [Aldor-l] [Axiom-developer] Axiom for Aldor or Aldor for Axiom?, Bill Page, 2007/09/04