[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %
From: |
Page, Bill |
Subject: |
RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and % |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Oct 2006 19:22:56 -0400 |
Gaby,
On Monday, October 16, 2006 7:15 PM you wrote:
>
> Consider the following code snipet:
>
>
> )abbrev domain T T
>
> Decl := Record(name: Symbol, type: T)
>
> T(): Public == Private where
> Public ==> with
> type: Symbol -> %
> decl: (Symbol, %) -> Decl
> Private ==> add
> decl(n,t) == [n,t]
>
>
> The SPAD compiler complains on the definition of decl with the
> following message
Why would you consider the type T itself to be known in the scope
where the value of Decl is computed?
Perhaps you meant to write
Decl := Record(name: Symbol, type: %)
which seems to compile as expected?
Regards,
Bill Page.
- [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/16
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %,
Page, Bill <=
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/16
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, root, 2006/10/17
- RE: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Page, Bill, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Waldek Hebisch, 2006/10/17
- Re: [Axiom-mail] Equivalence between named domain and %, Gabriel Dos Reis, 2006/10/17