axiom-math
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Axiom-math] Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re


From: Ralf Hemmecke
Subject: [Axiom-math] Re: [open-axiom-devel] [fricas-devel] Re: [fricas-devel] Re: iterators and cartesian product.
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 12:35:32 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070728)

On 10/23/2007 12:24 PM, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Ralf Hemmecke wrote:

| > What would be its meaning?
| | Maybe this one....

[aldor code]

Am I the only one here who believes that 'meaning' has to be given
mathematically, indenpendent of syntax, and typing rules must also be
given too?

Well, I only wanted to demonstrate that Bill might have had the wrong idea when he wanted 1..9 to be a domain instead of an element.
It seems that was not clear. Sorry.

Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]