[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value |
Date: |
Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:46:44 -0400 (EDT) |
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> I was almost done with a patch to this problem when I saw your patch. I'm
> glad to see you created yydestroyStackItem(). I had already created a
> similar function in my new patch. Once I update it for your version of the
> function, I'll post it. It'll probably be later today.
It seems that yydestroyStackItem() is inappropriately named. A
yyGLRStackItem can be either a yySemanticOption or yyGLRState. However,
your function operates only on a yyGLRState.
Let me know if you agree so I can update my new patch accordingly before
posting it.
Joel
- user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/24
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/24
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/24
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/25
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/25
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/25
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Paul Eggert, 2005/08/25
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/25
- Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value,
Joel E. Denny <=
Re: user destructor for unresolved GLR semantic value, Joel E. Denny, 2005/08/25