[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: glr.c: Token definitions
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: glr.c: Token definitions |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Sep 2005 11:46:07 -0400 (EDT) |
On Wed, 21 Sep 2005, Akim Demaille wrote:
> >>> "Paul" == Paul Eggert <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > "Joel E. Denny" <address@hidden> writes:
> >> What if the #define's disappear for %pure-parser?
>
> > But whether to use #define is independent of whether the parser is pure.
> > Instead, how about if we make the #define's disappear when the --yacc
> > (-y) option is not used?
>
> Am I understanding, from your proposal, that it is POSIX that mandates
> the #defines?
I'm quite ignorant on the standards and where to obtain the right copy.
However, I did find this:
http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/utilities/yacc.html
Look under `OUTPUT FILES / Header File'. It suggests #define's are
required.
Joel
- glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/19
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/20
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Paul Eggert, 2005/09/21
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/23
- Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Joel E. Denny, 2005/09/21
Re: glr.c: Token definitions, Akim Demaille, 2005/09/20