[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: no users destructors if stack 0 deleted (was: Re: duplicated user de
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: no users destructors if stack 0 deleted (was: Re: duplicated user destructor for lookahead) |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Oct 2005 15:03:26 -0400 (EDT) |
On Mon, 26 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Joel E. Denny wrote:
In the event of memory exhaustion, if stack 0 happens to be marked for
deletion (guaranteeing that in a test case is not something I want to think
about), no user destructors are called on any symbols.
I created a test case.
<snip>
I created a patch using this approach.
I've only tested after applying my earlier `duplicated user destructor for
lookahead' patch, which I cut from the diff for this patch.
I just want to be sure the two patches and one test case mentioned above
are not forgotten. You can find them here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00078.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bison-patches/2005-09/msg00109.html
Joel
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: no users destructors if stack 0 deleted (was: Re: duplicated user destructor for lookahead),
Joel E. Denny <=