[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: prologue alternatives
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: prologue alternatives |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Sep 2006 18:58:55 -0400 (EDT) |
On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Joel E. Denny wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Sep 2006, Paul Eggert wrote:
> > %{ A %}
> > %union { B }
> > %{ C %}
> > %%
> > D
> > %%
> > E
>
> Let's say A defines YYLTYPE. Let's say I reorganize my grammar and move
> or remove B. Now suddenly the compiler complains that I'm redefining
> YYLTYPE. That makes no sense. What does %union have to do with YYLTYPE?
Replace "move or remove B" with "move B above A". I got confused.
You might also imagine there was no B to begin with, and then I add one
to the beginning of the grammar.
- Re: prologue alternatives (was: Re: [GNU Bison 2.3] testsuite: 103 104 failed), Paul Eggert, 2006/09/13
- Re: prologue alternatives (was: Re: [GNU Bison 2.3] testsuite: 103 104 failed), Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/13
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/14
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/14
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/15
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/15
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/16
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/17
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/18
- Re: prologue alternatives, Paul Eggert, 2006/09/18
- Re: prologue alternatives, Joel E. Denny, 2006/09/18