|
From: | Paolo Bonzini |
Subject: | Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor |
Date: | Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:54:27 +0900 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.7 (Macintosh/20060909) |
Joel E. Denny wrote:
On Tue, 24 Oct 2006, Paolo Bonzini wrote:What about <UNTAGGED>? As inAn existing grammar might have a union field named UNTAGGED.
Can't deny that, but it seems unlikely... <!> is really too hieroglyphic for me. If anything, I would prefer <> or a trailing %untagged...
Paolo
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |