Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor

[Hans Aberg]

On 20 Nov 2006, at 23:41, Joel E. Denny wrote:

> > If one really does not want to use one of the main advantages of C+ 
> > +, classes
> > with constructors and destructors. I am not sure why one is not  
> > using C in
> > such a case. :-)
>
> C++ offers much more than just constructors and destructors for  
> semantic
> types in parsers.

I am not just sure exactly what, I mean, if one is not going to use C+ 
+ OO. I mean, the template system does not seem worth the effort. :-)

  Hans Aberg