Re: FYI: default %printer/%destructor

[Joel E. Denny]

On Wed, 22 Nov 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:

> Or vice versa: choosing a Unicode representation makes ASCII unnecessary,
> ecept for those poor guys that do not have an UTF-8 editor. But then for this
> latter, one might make separate Unicode-ASCII translators.

If the ASCII looks fine and is necessary anyway, why bother with Unicode?

> > Second, I don't see how this addresses the issue
> > we're discussing anyway: names for semantic values and locations.
> 
> Overuse of tokens may cause grammar conflicts.

That sounds nice in general, but I don't see a solution to our problem 
developing.

> It has popped up from time in Help-Bison, and the last time Akim seemed to be
> interested

If you're referring to the discussion in March, I see that he asked how it 
would work, which I still don't understand.  I saw no expression of 
interest afterwards.  Did I miss a message?