[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix? |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Dec 2006 15:49:50 -0500 (EST) |
On Thu, 14 Dec 2006, Hans Aberg wrote:
> Another idea that came to my mind, which I just mention, is to separate Bison
> language and compiler options. Language options should then go in the .y file,
> and the compiler options in some other file. But perhaps this is not the
> practise of other compilers.
>
> But by this idea, language options should then not be alterable by startup
> arguments. In particular, %language should only not be duplicated by a
> --language. Perhaps this idea is what you sense intuitively.
I'm afraid I don't know what is considered a "language option" versus a
"compiler option". Also, separate input files sounds like a paradigm
shift (and a lot of implementation work) that I don't think we're ready
for.
- %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/09
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Paul Eggert, 2006/12/10
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Hans Aberg, 2006/12/10
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Paolo Bonzini, 2006/12/11
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/12
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Hans Aberg, 2006/12/12
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/12
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Hans Aberg, 2006/12/12
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Joel E. Denny, 2006/12/14
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Hans Aberg, 2006/12/14
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?,
Joel E. Denny <=
- Re: %name-prefix overrides --name-prefix?, Hans Aberg, 2006/12/14