Re: preparing for 2.3b

[Joel E. Denny]

On Sat, 8 Mar 2008, Akim Demaille wrote:

> 
> Le 7 mars 08 à 01:24, Joel E. Denny a écrit :
> 
> > But should we reserve -D just in case we ever want it to do something like
> > gcc's -D?  I don't know.
> 
> If we do, we can use VAR=VALUE like Make.  Otherwise, we
> can use -H, like --header?  --defines is really a bit
> meaningless.  And --header might also be too C/C++
> centric, maybe --declaration, or --interface.

I agree that --defines is not the best name.

Maybe I can just drop -D from my patch but leave --defines and -d as 
separate options.  Then we can release 2.3b and figure this issue out 
afterwards.  Does that work for you?