[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fight nondeterminism in error messages
From: |
Joel E. Denny |
Subject: |
Re: Fight nondeterminism in error messages |
Date: |
Wed, 15 Jul 2009 04:59:24 -0400 (EDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20) |
On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Akim Demaille wrote:
> Hi Joel, Hello, World!\n,
Hi Akim.
> Sorry for being so distant currently :(
Me too.
> input.y:12.12-20: tokens HEXADECIMAL_2 and DECIMAL_2 both assigned number
> 16702650
> input.y:9.8-20: tokens DECIMAL_1 and HEXADECIMAL_1 both assigned number
> 11259375
>
> =>
>
> input.y:10.12-20: user token number 11259375 redeclaration for DECIMAL_1
> input.y:9.8-20: previous declaration for HEXADECIMAL_1
> input.y:12.12-20: user token number 16702650 redeclaration for DECIMAL_2
> input.y:11.8-20: previous declaration for HEXADECIMAL_2
>
> I have not pushed it because I'd like to have opinions. I don't like
> "redeclaration" for "user token number", "assigned again"/"previous
> assignment" seems better to me, but if we can keep "declaration" that's better
> as it is less work for the translators. And IANAN (I am not a native).
I'm fine with the wording shown above. If that's easier for the
translators, then let's keep it.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Fight nondeterminism in error messages,
Joel E. Denny <=