bison-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Style change and some factoring


From: Joel E. Denny
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Style change and some factoring
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 17:07:56 -0400 (EDT)
User-agent: Alpine 1.00 (DEB 882 2007-12-20)

Hi Alex.

On Sat, 4 Jul 2009, Alex Rozenman wrote:

> I pushed the attached patch to the master. The patch contains various style
> fixes (according to Akim's request) and some factoring. I will also
> cherry-pick to branch-2.5.

I just ran make maintainer-check-valgrind in branch-2.5:tests/.  There are 
some memory leaks in your named reference code as revealed by test group 
29, shown below.  Could you take a look at that?  Thanks.

% VALGRIND_OPTS='--leak-check=full --show-reachable=yes' ./testsuite 
PREBISON='valgrind -q' PREPARSER='valgrind -q' -v 29
## ----------------------------------- ##
## GNU Bison 2.4.1.92-cba9 test suite. ##
## ----------------------------------- ##
29. named-refs.at:20: testing ...
./named-refs.at:189: bison -o test.c test.y
--- /dev/null   2009-04-16 12:14:40.000000000 -0400
+++ 
/home/jdenny/cs/bison/bison-git/tests/testsuite.dir/at-groups/29/stderr 
2009-07-22 16:03:35.000000000 -0400
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+==15074== 
+==15074== 120 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 1 of 2
+==15074==    at 0x4022AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
+==15074==    by 0x4022BFC: realloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:429)
+==15074==    by 0x8084B28: xrealloc (xmalloc.c:57)
+==15074==    by 0x806B2BD: xnrealloc (xalloc.h:136)
+==15074==    by 0x806B266: variant_table_grow (scan-code.l:348)
+==15074==    by 0x806B380: variant_add (scan-code.l:380)
+==15074==    by 0x806B729: parse_ref (scan-code.l:478)
+==15074==    by 0x806C7FE: handle_action_dollar (scan-code.l:653)
+==15074==    by 0x8068AE6: code_lex (scan-code.l:185)
+==15074==    by 0x806CF9B: translate_action (scan-code.l:785)
+==15074==    by 0x806D1B8: code_props_translate_code (scan-code.l:854)
+==15074==    by 0x8066150: reader (reader.c:704)
+==15074== 
+==15074== 
+==15074== 392 bytes in 14 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 2 of 
2
+==15074==    at 0x4022AB8: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:207)
+==15074==    by 0x8084BA1: xmalloc (xmalloc.c:45)
+==15074==    by 0x8056F15: named_ref_new (named-ref.c:28)
+==15074==    by 0x806175B: gram_parse (parse-gram.y:556)
+==15074==    by 0x8065E63: reader (reader.c:591)
+==15074==    by 0x8053ACA: main (main.c:82)
29. named-refs.at:20:  FAILED (named-refs.at:189)





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]