[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch queue at Savannah
From: |
Tim Landscheidt |
Subject: |
Re: Patch queue at Savannah |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:43:55 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Paul Eggert <address@hidden> wrote:
> [...]
> There are also some non-patch reports pending at
> <https://savannah.gnu.org/support/?group=bison>
> but I left those alone.
> Maybe we should switch to debbugs? It's more commonly
> used these days, at least among projects I help maintain.
Recently, there was a discussion about why git doesn't have
a bugtracker at the moment. I didn't follow it to the end,
but I found Junio's remarks at
<URI:http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/192008>
quite interesting.
I think Bison has a code base that is similar in its rath-
er limited scope, also relatively few, but experienced users
and - most importantly - very few bugs :-). So I wouldn't
necessarily want to press solutions to issues that might oc-
cur into using the correct web form or mail address when
TODO, branches, mailing lists, etc. work reasonably fine.
Tim