[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH 0/5] {maint} restore C90 compliance
From: |
Paul Eggert |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH 0/5] {maint} restore C90 compliance |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Dec 2012 00:39:34 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 |
On 12/28/2012 02:34 AM, Akim Demaille wrote:
> I also see that there are also some uses of a declaration in the
> for-loops, but surprisingly few: ...
> (And the first two seem to be #if 0'd). Is it considered ok
> too?
Yes, that should work too.
- [PATCH 5/5] yacc.c: scope reduction, (continued)
- [PATCH 5/5] yacc.c: scope reduction, Akim Demaille, 2012/12/12
- [PATCH 4/5] tests: C90 compliance, Akim Demaille, 2012/12/12
- [PATCH 2/5] glr.c: scope reduction, Akim Demaille, 2012/12/12
- [PATCH 3/5] fix C90 compliance, Akim Demaille, 2012/12/12
- Re: [PATCH 0/5] {maint} restore C90 compliance, Paul Eggert, 2012/12/12