[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands
|
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands |
|
Date: |
Sat, 03 May 2014 11:11:34 -0700 |
On Sat, 2014-05-03 at 14:22 +0800, Elias Mårtenson wrote:
> As much as I am a fan of extensions, I have to admit that I don't
> fully understand the justification for this. After all, the
> pkg-commands are plain functions, so why not expose them as such?
The short answer is that some tasks seem more convenient if the
interface doesn't have to conform to strict APL syntax.
- [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, David B. Lamkins, 2014/05/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, Elias Mårtenson, 2014/05/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands,
David B. Lamkins <=
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/05/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, David B. Lamkins, 2014/05/03
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, David B. Lamkins, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, David Lamkins, 2014/05/06
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, Juergen Sauermann, 2014/05/07
- Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands, David B. Lamkins, 2014/05/07