Re: [Bug-apl] A modest proposal: user-defined commands

[Elias Mårtenson]

Speaking of the Emacs mode. The latest version supports tab-expansion of user-defined commands. Thank Jürgen for providing me with the necessary information to make this possible.

Regards,

Elias

On 8 May 2014 00:19, David B. Lamkins <address@hidden> wrote:

I had to ponder this for a few moments, since I've become so accustomed
to working with APL scripts rather than workspaces. (Kudos to Elias for
gnu-apl-mode!)

Of course it makes perfect sense that you wouldn't want to wipe out your
]USERCMD definitions when (re) )LOADing a workspace from an xml file:
the workspace file can't (re-)establish the ]USERCMD definitions that it
needs.

Fair enough...

Turning to a script-based use case, then:

When a script contains ]USERCMD definitions, re-)LOADing the script
reruns the ]USERCMD definitions. In this case, each redefinition causes
a (harmless, in this case) BAD COMMAND message.

It'd be helpful if the BAD COMMAND message was suppressed in the case of
redefining a ]USERCMD identically to its existing definition.

On Wed, 2014-05-07 at 12:40 +0200, Juergen Sauermann wrote:
> Hi David,
>
>  I think they should because commands work outside of workspaces.
> Think of one workspace installing commands and another using them.
> You can ]USERCMD REMOVE-ALL to remove all commands.
>
> /// Jürgen
>
>
> On 05/06/2014 09:41 PM, David Lamkins wrote:
>
> > Thank you.
> >
> > One more thing: ]usercmd definitions probably shouldn't survive
> > )load and )clear.