[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-apl] Revisiting the APL 2 empty-array display behavior
|
From: |
David B. Lamkins |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-apl] Revisiting the APL 2 empty-array display behavior |
|
Date: |
Wed, 28 May 2014 17:55:54 -0700 |
On Wed, 2014-05-28 at 18:11 -0500, Blake McBride wrote:
> Dear David,
>
>
> Thanks for the idiom reference!
>
You're welcome. :)
>
> With a lot of respect, I think you missed my point. The APL 1 idiom
> works as you want and expect in APL 1, APL 2, and GNU APL. Look
> closely at my example.
>
>
> On the other hand, if it is I who is missing the point (quite
> possible), please explain.
>
No, you're entirely correct. I misunderstood what I was seeing in a
different context, I think.
Not enough sleep... :(
Thanks again.